|
莆田翻譯公司關鍵字：First, the compensation for asymmetric information. Sometimes, the regulation is intended to reduce the cost to get information. First, the government managed to provide the products consumers want accurate information, or require the operator to provide. Of course, incomplete information is not simply provide more information can be solved. When it is difficult to understand the technology involved in the product data, the Government needs to establish or implement quality standards or the manufacturer production license issued. Because consumers do not evaluate different products have the necessary expertise or information.Second, regulation by regulation. Rely mainly on the economic regulation of the legal authority to government agencies, licensing or other means approved by the Government in the implementation of these powers, to a certain extent, have the right to freedom of decision. When the government is also a natural monopoly organization, who, in what way to regulate the system of government? Grass benefits that: a right as "legal monopoly" of the regulator to limit the abuse of authority, to monitor whether the economic benefits of its regulatory action to maximize the system is necessary. I agree with this view. Because, the regulator will inevitably abuse of power for personal gain, or for the purpose of maintaining a certain group interests. Stiglitz's one way to solve the natural monopoly of nationalization, it is possible that some of these industries are subject to political pressure.Third, separating. Separating the contents of China's economic reform often seem to be talking about. The government's micro-regulation put forward, is of special significance. Because only broken regulator and be regulated between enterprises of direct interest linked to the regulatory agencies transcendent exercise of economic regulation functions, be possible to make it neutral to economic welfare is maximized as a principle, impartiality and integrity, in accordance with Rules and Regulations.
|