|
開封翻譯公司關鍵字：be higher, while the smaller role of incentives, and information than the social costs of rent, low-efficiency incentives to bring low cost is relatively small. In other words, China should choose the cost of compensation mechanism based on cost, rather than a fixed price or price cap mechanism.
China's current situation, there are some reasons to support the regulation of the low excitation intensity the choice of tools. First, Averch & Johnson model demonstrated that in the investment rate of return regulation (ROR), companies tend to have impulse to invest in China's Internet industry, currently there is still a "bottleneck" problem, this objective becomes a useful result that encourages investment; Second, is generally believed that the investment rate of return regulation and the difficulty of operating costs is greater than the price cap regulation. However, China has adopted price cap regulation there is a series of statistical problems. China's retail price index (RPI) has not produced some important information to include the price (although the revised method of calculating the price index adding a lot of production and service prices翻譯價格費用, but the real price index has a great deviation) ; Moreover, China's production material prices翻譯價格費用 are still an adjustment phase, and many of the non-price factors, even with the price of production, RPI can not reasonably explain the price of the price level; the same time, due to lack of data, technical progress rate (X ) calculations even more difficult. While the investment rate of return regulation but also by the relatively accurate accounting system to ensure, but relative to the price cap regulation is still greater maneuverability.In addition, from the control point of view, most of China's Internet industry has been a double or multiple leaders, and the separation of powers will lead to inefficiency; China is still a low-income countries, the wealth constraint is quite obvious, and the banking system and capital market翻譯市場行情價格多少錢 efficiency is very low, increasing the limited liability constraint (the incentive feasible set smaller), thereby reducing the efficiency of the contract; a lot of people think that the goal of state-owned enterprises not only to maximize profits, so they are not in accordance with commercial principles , and a variety of targets have a negative impact on business incentives. Variables of these systems翻譯價格標準 also require regulatory incentives to choose low-strength tools for the regulation of the construction of China's regulatory system for policy recommendationsFrom the above analysis we can see, at this stage should choose a low excitation intensity of China's regulatory tools, but the flip side of China's urgent need for enterprises to provide additional incentive for enterprises to improve production
|