|
運城翻譯公司關鍵字：pockets, "additional education." In the town "by the local People's Government included in the capital investment plan." Rural school in 2001 farmers spending $ 13 billion. (3) farmers not only pay the agricultural tax, and pay the tax on special agricultural products. Farmers had to pay only on the agricultural land area, farmers adjust the structure of reform, development of a variety of business, create wealth, increase income. However, farmers' income capacity is overestimated, the introduction of a special agricultural product tax. The contribution of farmers to the addition of a country. Chinese farmers used to pay "payroll" tax, do not know to the world, not many countries tax agriculture. (4) additional burden on farmers' grass-roots political operation costs. Township agencies redundant, staff expansion, rising expenses. As a result, the township government no longer do the people of the "night watchman" (duty to defend property合理翻譯收費 rights), but reached into the pockets of farmers. Various levies, charges and fines despite repeated prohibitions (annual 200 million). "First light-duty, two heavy duty three tax is a bottomless pit." Farmers have less and less is always your money. In fact, this is also a great relationship with the tax system. Revenue-sharing at all levels of government in the form of distribution tax, but the township are the "tail", assigned to the final did not separable, the farmers only get surgery. Therefore, "the tax system to reveal the relationship between urban and rural areas is still distorted and the relationship between workers and peasants." (5) farmers from the proactive fiscal policy in the less tangible benefits. In recent years, countries in the adjustment of income policy, the implementation of proactive fiscal policy, measures to increase income of urban residents to take more measures to increase farmers' income while the less. 1999 2000 national and state institutions for civil servants who pay (up to the country from the financial support by 48 million people!), Improve social security for urban residents, urban residents 'income increased 9.3%, while farmers' income increased only 3.8%. Government bonds is more urban, less rural areas. Disposable income of urban and rural income by more than 3:1. Through the above analysis, it can image that, rural people in the slow lane to create wealth, create wealth in urban fast lane. Rural and urban incomes and wealth in the way a "dual system." Farmers out of their rights are not,
|