|
麗江翻譯公司關鍵字：In China, 1950 and 1970, for a number of historical factors, has experienced such a modern inputs in agriculture at the same time, there was a large-scale labor-intensive. The most typical example is the use of mechanized farming to three times a year for the implementation of the system, in the southern region of rice for the year two - three times a year for the wheat to rice - rice - wheat. This could reduce the labor input is converted to further improve the mechanization of labor-intensive methods of agriculture: the role of mechanized farming, mainly in connection to one or two periods of tension in the growing of two close rice and rush rush rush kinds of rice farming become possible. Thus, the role of mechanization is mainly labor-intensive and increase in volume, resulting in the formation of three times a year for volume-based production system, leading to the inevitable diminishing returns, which eat into the mechanization of the potential labor increase productivity and remuneration. Although the final total agricultural output has tripled, but the total labor input during the same period has increased four times, the result is stagnation of labor remuneration, that farmers' incomes and living standards stagnated, China and therefore did not achieve advanced Western countries and Japan experienced the modernization of rural living standards. Looking back, the technical conditions at the time, the Chinese population is too great, an increase of speed is too fast, and in the policy has not taken appropriate measures, which tackle the backlog.The current historic opportunity for China's agricultural developmentSubsequently, during the reform era, because the convergence of several different historical trends and the formation of a "Chinese characteristics" new historic opportunity. One factor is the development of rural industries in the 1980s, absorbed in a billion years into the rural labor force. Followed by post-1990s wave of large-scale urban workers, but also absorbed a million rural labor force. Thus, in the past twenty years, the rural non-farm labor absorbed 40% of the total labor force, largely to ease the population pressure on land.Nevertheless, in today's systems and technical conditions, still has a large rural labor surplus, the equivalent of today's farmers a third to half the total labor force. In other words, today's 300 million employees in agricultural employment is mostly semi-or full employment (which means "hidden unemployment"). In that case, people generally believe that only in a higher degree of urbanization to solve the population pressure is possible after a fundamental change in agricultural production and farmers income. Even the rural people themselves have also been quite common in agriculture as there is no way out of the impasse, do everything possible to let their children out of agriculture and rural areas. This is currently the so-called "three rural" issue a major source.
|