|
天門翻譯公司關鍵字：In the study of economics, whether in developed or developing countries, will inevitably also have given the highest priority is rural issues (farmers, rural, agriculture). As the first industry itself decided that it is a property of low-value industries, the proportion of low-industrial society, the indicators seem to have little effect on the overall economy, but to do this is often the researchers in the field of economic academic leader, which seems contrary to common sense. The first is that although the industry is willing to lower output, but mostly the production of production necessities, is a basic industry, support the second and third industries, so its importance is evident. Developed a relatively simple problem in rural areas, the majority has embarked on the industrialization of agriculture, a lower proportion of rural population, farmers' income than the city average worker wages low, and inclined to support government policies; the problem is more severe in rural areas of developing countries, urban low level of rural population base, the overall economy was unhealthy patterns of development, are disproportionately affected and are affecting the economic development overlap. Indeed, most developing countries is faster, but to recognize the fact that a country's economic growth rate is determined by the level behind the high growth rate does not really represent economic development. The pursuit of economic development in developing countries is based on high consumption in exchange for high growth, the main contribution to economic growth from the secondary industry and tertiary industry, the basic role of the first industries to be ignored, the problem will become increasingly serious in rural areas . Blind pursuit of some developing countries, especially some of the so-called "signs", unrealistic increase the "urbanization" level, resulting in a large number of farmers lost their land, as the process of urbanization in the new employment pressure, but also for long-term social stability conceals security risks. Indeed, it is important to rural issues, the real exposure to the exploration and study of this idea is understandable, if not part of the success or success, but for scientific research has opened the way. China's rural studies quite abnormal, can be just like Mao Yushi and Wen Tiejun rely on personal prestige to the test, although I do not agree and believe that their research can really solve the rural problem, but at least it has a lot of people to get the real benefits, they are worthy of respect. Like 茅先生 test, I think, and not within a wide range of applications, the inherent defects of private finance and economic assumption that people will eventually fail in a wide range of applications is also not want to see can not be avoided. Mr. Mao Yushi way to do things, but should be considered the most practical research methods, academic enough to play with so many self-styled economists lost face. On this issue, I "Chinese Rural Studies" has done a summary, in China, which is most likely to fame is the most fertile soil to develop well-known economist, is the only comparable with the study of Marxism, but also the results at least up to the actual results of research. Topic around the back, mainly the lack of effective assessment of academic standards and the corresponding monitoring system, China's rural studies a significant proportion of the sponsorship funds, many fund rural research is required to adapt rather than proceed to solve practical problems, many factors led to the accumulation China economic problems of the inefficiency.
China has always respected Marxist, although the Western Economics (here follow the general term) theory of the correlation analysis did find useful, but by the ideological and social pressure from the public will be positive previously described "academic plagiarism "Packaging is interpreted as its own theory, even if the dispute does not rise to the level of class struggle. Give a true system of Western economic theory is scientific and rational and objective evaluation of recent years. We must address the role and influence of Western economics, both macro-or micro-, if, as a final chapter of this comprehensive textbook economics, the negative criticism of Western economics is not desirable. Wearing colored glasses to see the problem easily confused and confusing, it is difficult to imagine with a scholarship when it does not endorse and negative to compile a Western economics textbooks have any good results, no matter how much fame big or what authority he is. If he is only doing his research is pretty understandable, but once a textbook inevitably fraught with suspicion. Can not say he did well, but at least he can not always understand the discipline of the core and essence of even the most basic sense of identity are not, how can a true understanding of the subject. The existence of any subject has ever existed and it is reasonable, Marxist political economics and western economics colleagues as the economic development disciplines, and their coexistence is inevitable. Marxism was born in the 19th century, when the "Das Kapital" and constitute the theoretical basis, or for reasons too personal worship, the development of Marxist economics and the idea did not follow the development of Marxist philosophy. This must understand that economics is different from the philosophy. The economy was
|