|
固原翻譯公司關鍵字：cooperative economy "further development; state (ie, social) for all socio-economic life, "macro" and capitalist "economic planning" ("capitalism also has plans"); social security measures to further increase and the European "welfare state" there; "multinational" and "capitalist world political and economic integration, "the rapid development, etc., - all of which are encouraging to note: in the developed capitalist society, is continuing to undergo, although not revolutionary, blizzard, but it is a quiet, slow, gradual, with some "qualitative" nature of the "quantity" change. Therefore, in this case, how an "open" and "development of Marxist economics," the mind and attitude, to study contemporary capitalism in the economic development of these new phenomena, which may further explore and discover included those with human society forward toward - a socialist society - the transition of the "nature of the transition point" and "embryonic" and "factor", as I used it in the new historical conditions, prosperity and development of Marxism doctrine of the "theory of economics," including its "socialist economic theory", no doubt of great significance. And do not mean the slightest concession toward the direction of capitalism and integration, but to continue along the path of Marx and Engels. Because they all scientific theory of socialism for capitalism, mainly through economic and political analysis derived.
On the other hand, Marx and Engels, after all, no personal experience of the socialist society and its economic development practice. The contemporary world socialist movement, but it already has nearly a century, in the dictatorship of the proletariat under the conditions of the socialist revolution and socialist construction practice, and has accumulated a lot of, both positive and negative experiences. Founder of scientific socialism, Marxist economics of classical writers, no, can not and should today's socialist construction of our programs or to provide ready-made blueprint. Every generation faces the task, have to rely on their predecessors in the inheritance of this generation on the basis of achievement, through their own practice to solve. We are engaged in the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics, it is such an unprecedented undertaking. Therefore, from a theoretical point of view of economics, to prosperity and development of socialism with Chinese characteristics and economics, it must be based on that we are currently engaged in the cause, in the Marxist stand, viewpoint and method under the guidance of the bold theoretical innovation . So, I think, for the third plenary session, since the formation of "emancipating the mind, seeking truth from facts," the ideological line, we must continue to persist. The problem is: the need to prevent and overcome a tendency to cover up a mistake, another error prone. For example, you can not overcome the "paradigm of the Soviet Union" and "socialist dogmatism" After that, replace it with "bourgeois economics paradigm" of "capitalism dogmatism." On the contrary, both the need to prevent and overcome. Only on this basis, be possible to continue to develop truly new vision, to open up a new realm, establish a truly worthy of the name of "political economy of socialism with Chinese characteristics."
(F) continue to vigorously carry out the bourgeois political economy of contemporary research, "remove the dross, and absorb the essence of" efforts to promote Marxist economics research tool or means of modernization.
Bourgeois economics are talking about here, which is now commonly referred to as "Western economics." Which includes both the "scientific" or "classic" "bourgeois economics", including "vulgar" and "contemporary" bourgeois economics. As already mentioned: Marxist economics and bourgeois economics as their were two different ideologies in general, is in itself contradictory to each other. But that does not mean that their specific content and conclusions, and always are in conflict. Which indeed contains many of the same or similar place. The emphasis here is: At present, our task of Marxist economists, in addition to serious criticism of the bourgeois ideology or clear the economics, the careful study and learn, are also important tasks. This is because:
First, as aforesaid, as bourgeois economy as a whole, although all belong to the bourgeois ideology, but that does not mean that all the bourgeois ideology of "bias." In the scientific removed these "bourgeois prejudices", the total will be some part of "normal production" aspects, as well as "how many belong to different social patterns" of the commodity economy and the "market economy" of the content. And, as "people's correct ideas come not from heaven," as people's erroneous ideas as well. Therefore, even if only part of those areas of the capitalist economy, they also have their own objective basis, but also the reality of capitalist economic relations in the reflection of bourgeois economic theory. Even bourgeois vulgar economics as well. After all, they also reflect many of the capitalist economy or the appearance of the phenomenon of economic relations. In capitalist production, where the parties, especially the concept of these parties, these relations are correct, objective and effective. So, in this sense, do not know how bourgeois economics, it is impossible to truly understand what is capitalism, and thus it is impossible completely to understand what socialism is. Not only that, but I think that some of vulgar economics point of view, used to describe the capitalist economy is vulgar; However, for the "premise" or "subject" (or "society"), used to describe China's socialist society economic problems, it is possible to become "not so vulgar," the.
Second, bourgeois economics is the "results of human thought and culture." From the perspective of historical materialism, which certainly contains many "good" thing. Marx and Engels Marxism, is critically inherited their time until "the whole of human society to create excellent ideas and cultural achievements," was established on the basis of. Marxist economics as well. Therefore, in order in the new historical conditions, prosperity and development of Marxist theory of economics, in addition to adhere to the guidance of Marxism, the new practice-oriented theory of continuous distillation, it also must take over the baton of Marx, Marx and Engels opened up for study and criticism of bourgeois economics, especially for the contemporary critique of bourgeois economics to proceed. And as Sun Yefang veteran said: "critical", or "criticism" (German Kritik). Is "one divides into two" is "analysis." Is "remove the dross, and absorb the essence."
Third, scientific study, from the point of view, this is a serious and rigorous scientific research or critical required. As we have noted before: for Marxist economics, whether in favor or against, first of all it should be understood. In my opinion, for bourgeois economics should also take the same attitude.
Fourth, the contemporary Western economics is an important feature advertised or "superiority" is the so-called "scientific economics", "refined" and "precise" and "mathematical." Although I think, from a theoretical point of view of economics, but also means that while bourgeois economics along from the "political economy", - the "theory of economics" (or so-called "pure economics"), - - to the "mathematical science" track the emergence of such a "theory" and "ideology" on the big defeat, retreat and a large exodus, that had like a "hermit crab" as to avoid the "math" that was originally does not belong to its own "shell" to go, but it is in the "shell", the mini-mart "weaving" and that "small room", but still very "delicate" of. And if put aside this ideological background is not that the economic science of "precision" and "refined" and including "mathematical methods", including the modern scientific method in the application field of economics, it is by no means Western economics that bourgeois economics "patent", but as a "scientific" Marxist economics, the proper meaning of the title. In addition, some writers in Western economics, their style and language, described in the popularization of his theory and engaging, it also made a lot of work. Samuelson's "Economics", it called an example. These areas also worthy of our study of Marxist economists. Not the case, some of our Marxist economists, in these "refined" and "spectacular" thing before, sometimes it will inevitably feel embarrassed and ashamed of, and may even get lost and defeated.
In short, I think, our country's Marxist economists must try to study, familiar, and it is best to "proficient" Western economics, but to strive to make the study of Marxist economic theory, the tools and means of modernization. On the other hand, China's economic circles in the Western theory of economics teaching and research comrades, you must be a firm Marxist. Otherwise, in China, the two would not have better qualifications for the study of economic theory.
|