|
文山翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：In fact in 1800, the formerly British colonies of the United States has been independent for 24 years. Why the United States to be independent? Because of economic interests with the UK division. Why the economic benefits will be split? Is due to their different economic development. So in 1800, not only the United Kingdom, the United States and its Yansheng Zi has developed to a high extent. After another 200 years, Americans Pomeranz English books published in the United States, has made a 1800 British and the degree of economic development in southern China roughly the same conclusion, I really do not know that there is no one in the United States believe that assertion. Ironically, the Pomeranz (due to his far-fetched thesis) in China has found a lot of "Friends" or even an admirer, "historical research", "Modern History Research" also posted at the layout valuable introduction or commentary, exposed China is far from the social sciences and social sciences to keep up with the pace of the world ... ...A large number of indirect materials may be better to believe the British in 1800 there has been a huge contrast with the Chinese.
Independence in the United States in 1776, the British economist Adam Smith published his famous book "The Wealth of Nations", which spoke of his visit to the pins of the plant division of labor: a man pumping iron wire, pull the other person straight, third cut, the fourth person sharpened, polished the top five in order to install the round; to do round requires three different operating; loaded round is a specialized business, the needle is another white- a; even pins put into the tray is also a professional. Because of this specialization, the production per worker per day thousands of needles. He concluded that, if workers opt for separate work, then they certainly can not produce 20 per person per day pins, and perhaps not even one can make out. Provide examples from Smith can imagine, when the British division of labor and specialization in the plant has reached the extent. 1776 is 41 years of the Qing Emperor Qianlong, China is also fully in a traditional society. And in 1800, just a British shareholder and manager Owen to lead his start as a big year for cotton, the cotton mills of the original 500 people, was developed to 2500. According to Owen, saying, "This is 2500 people engaged in the work of people to the community that produced real wealth in less than half a century ago also need to produce 60 million people out and I asked myself: This is the wealth consumed 2,500 and previous consumption of 60 million people should be the difference between the wealth gone? "he himself said," Without these machines to create new wealth, it can not overthrow Napoleon and maintain the principles of aristocratic society war "(quoted from Engels:" Anti-Duhring, "December 1970 version 1, P260). Since about 1800, the British textile industry "productivity" has been developed to such a height, we can say something it Pomeranz's thesis? With Wangjia Fan's words, is the new "Arabian Nights."
|